home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: node238.fc.net!goochb
- From: goochb@rwi.com (William D. Gooch)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
- Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++?
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:50:14
- Organization: RothWell International
- Message-ID: <goochb.337.0008D69E@rwi.com>
- References: <3134D499.653E@ix.netcom.com> <315BFB16.B74@isg.de> <4jgv6t$hon@kadath.zeitgeist.net> <4k3cdo$np5@taurus.adnc.com> <DpEJnu.DDL@news.hawaii.edu> <4kqhit$jie@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: node238.fc.net
- X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
-
- In article <4kqhit$jie@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> ozma@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (Mike Zorn) writes:
-
- > Multiple inheritance, like Nehru jackets and the 14th Amendment
- >(prohibition), should be thought of as a probably good idea that
- >just never worked out.
-
- Gosh, hasn't this been discussed enough before? MI has
- great value when used appropriately. Added complexity
- and indirection in instance structures or redundant code
- are essentially the only ways to compensate for its lack.
-
-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- William D. Gooch
- RothWell International
- goochb@rwi.com
- Texas liaison for the International Programmers Guild
- For information on IPG, see http://www.ipgnet.com/ipghome.htm
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-